Swine flu. The media roll so roll again. The diversity of opinion is radically simplified. A climate of hysteria can be a fear for the mind and makes any objection silenced. In short, it's time again to get suspicious.
Whenever it from all newspapers, all television sets and all the speakers roar begins, it says to me: clogged ears, against the grain.
The current situation is contrary to all experience of life that tell us that it would actually give the "swine flu" a diversity of opinion and public debate. This is reflected, but never ever again.
But we do not know These things first: The climate hysteria, for example, and completely under-represented view The man who scientists and lay people, the climate can not see through the man-made reasons CO2, provides just one example, a blueprint for in terms of " bring out swine flu "even a pocket lamp and illuminate the dark corners slightly.
Of course it's me above all a matter of principle, namely to show that there are serious and not about other opinions, to decide in detail what is ultimately a "right" or "wrong" is to be considered.
It is in terms of "virus" does not even clarify the basics of scientific debate:
As such, we know from biology viruses as living together peacefully in symbiosis with simple organisms such as bacteria. They have support and auxiliary functions such as metabolism.
"In more complex organisms, particularly humans, or animals and plants that you have such structures, which could be called viruses, but never seen. The actual, scientifically proven practice within the highly complex viruses Geschehnisses the cells among themselves helping a supportive and not a destructive function. "
This is a statement of the German microbiologist Dr. Stefan Lanka, who because of his previous approach to the root of the problem, has made a name.
For me as a layperson is important first of all that there ever is a scientific consensus that something other than a "war scenario" described in viruses, and this view is also backed up with evidence.
When dealing with the "virus problem" are emerging, especially two "sticking points":
1) The clean, direct and indirect evidence of the problem of viruses
2) The non-calibrated test method for the detection of viruses
Dr. Lanka vehemently criticized the lack of a direct virus detection . And not just since the swine or avian flu. For direct detection of viruses are the incorruptible science instruments:
For the direct detection of a virus is a photo! The first photo shows from blood, saliva or other bodily fluid isolated virus and the second photo shows the same virus in the organism itself
Dr. Lanka says simply that there is no single such photo that clearly show such a very well recognizable virus.
Another direct virus detection methods is a biochemistry: electrophoresis. This separates the proteins from the nucleic acid of a virus and how it fits into the "gel electrophoresis" as a stripe pattern dar. This is also known as "genetic fingerprint". This in turn can also photograph well.
Dr. Lanka says it is from this neither a photograph nor any other publication, which would prove that "genetic fingerprint". For example, even with the swine flu virus.
The two described methods for direct detection of viruses as evidence of the alleged Vogelgrippe-/Schweinegrippe-Viren etc. However, not even taken into consideration!
This, however, indirect. And there's a problem: The test procedures are not calibrated. Their results are as meaningful and therefore changeable, as a non-certified scale.
A typical indirect "virus proof" goes like this: The eggshell angebrüteter chicken eggs extracts (of alleged viruses) through the shell is injected into the chicken embryo. The early death of the embryo or later depends mainly on how much is injected and where. Death of the embryo, provided the (indirect) virus-proof.
Only this example should be thought-provoking. The troubled contemporary wonders: Why is not actually a photo for an isolated virus demonstrated in public? Where is the swine flu virus? A real photo and not a computer model please!
These questions and ask for some years engaged citizens in the context of the so-called "small-small actions . " The responses to numerous to authorities, officials, health departments and ministries looking letters and inquiries could be found clearly that no one anywhere could cause such a direct virus detection or can. Science and government have rather to "agreed" that there is a "deadly" virus, it ie a so-called "consensus" have made it!
From a "small-small action":
... You hand over the two confessions of the highest Bavarian Health Authority, the Bavarian State Office for Health and Food Safety, which the influenza and avian influenza viruses are valid only in the consensus to exist, and that neither this state authority, nor any other authority for the argument for the existence responsibility of viruses. So do not, as has been demonstrated, the WHO ...
These and similar to the website of the small-small-publishing well-documented actions everyone can take part: Simply by authorities, ministries' disease, helplines, "" hotlines "etc. inquire inquire, evidence, sources, a photo of the isolated virus! Wait for the answers. And be amazed!
If it were possible now to disrupt the deployment phase of the disease, the planners' strategic plans, "we could possibly gain time, we urgently need a public debate in order to put the swine flu advocates the craft.
Many calls, emails and inquiries from the disease planners and consent authorities could save a lot of money and the guarantors maintain health!
Who wants to read up on the topic of this official line-suffering contrary to scientific opinion something that is both as an entry on 27/10/2005 and on 01/03/2006 recommended with Dr. Stefan Lanka conducted interviews of the online magazine "FAKTuell".
Tags: direct virus detection , Dr. Stefan Lanka , swine flu
[...] Used). Above all, however, surprised the legal action, because the postulated retrovirus, the microbiologist Dr. Stefan Lanka, following to this day neither isolated nor otherwise been detected (see also the spirit of the time series (in [...]
AIDS, avian flu, swine flu, and whatever else comes with everything the bank has flu uh banking crisis tun.Ich to know for sure if we want to live, many people do. For my part, I will do what, I have an appointment with a lawyer and would suit Mr. Merkel and at Sfr. Westerwelle rise and rise against Jochen Ackermann as Chairman of the International Bankers Association lawsuit.