Against the Springer journal THE WORLD must be reported to a war of aggression criminal charges of sedition and incitement to journalistic aid. It is also understood that the sheet a complaint by the Bundespresserat must be granted because it violated the most important principle of the Press Code, which reads: respect for truth and respect for human dignity. This Code of Ethics applies from 1.1.2009 for online media.
On 3.2.2010 is widely through the media that Iran wants to enter into concrete negotiations with foreign countries, so that uranium could be enriched there. "Ahmadinejad said Iran was ready to sign a contract for uranium exchange with the nuclear powers. Low-enriched uranium it could also be brought from Iran abroad, he says. "(GA Bonn, 3.2.2010, p 2). Low-enriched uranium (3.5%) in abroad concrete terms, then (France, Russia) are brought to 20% and then be sent back as a fuel for a research reactor in Iran. This solution to the nuclear dispute had been looming for weeks, if you followed the media reports carefully.
The Iranian president continued:
"We are not against it, to send our low-enriched uranium abroad because we want a constructive cooperation and because we can always produce low-enriched uranium in Iran again," Ahmadinejad said. For his departure from the previous position he called "technical reasons."
Instead of responding to this offer constructive-concrete, the United States, however, go further obviously a delaying tactic - to keep other options open?
Even worse: U.S. hawks who win in the U.S. after Obama's election defeats momentum again, call right now only the bombing of Iran:
World-online from 3.2.2010: Iran must be bombed, which would have the same advantage to convey the Obama's poll numbers, which are down, up.
"Barack Obama should bomb Iran,
By Daniel Pipes, 3 February 2010, 12:18 pm Clock, Barack Obama's poll numbers falling into the basement. On the issues of unemployment and health system he has failed, he has also lost three elections. A dramatic gesture is needed to change public perception. He must be to destroy the Iranian nuclear weapons command. "
Something so cynical and dehumanizing end I have long ceased to read.
The WORLD is an author, a forum of a war of aggression, destruction of lives and risking a Middle East war, which could easily lead to a world war, as an effective means calls in all seriousness, to improve "poll numbers"!
"He needs a dramatic gesture to change his public perception as a lightweight, Tinker, ideologue, preferably in an arena where the stakes are high, where he where he can take the lead and exceed expectations.
Favorable circumstances for an attack
There is such an opportunity: Obama can give the U.S. military the order to destroy the Iranian nuclear weapons capability. The circumstances are favorable. First, U.S. intelligence agencies took their grotesque National Intelligence Estimate from 2007 back, and that was the report, was claimed under the "great certainty", Tehran had "halted its nuclear weapons program." No one (except the rulers in Iran and their agents) denies that the regime loving it build a large nuclear arsenal. "
This is a lie. In the last "National Intelligence Estimate" from 2008 is to read about:
"Intelligence on Iran's Nuclear Program
Changes to the NIE process are most evident in the community's estimate on Iranian nuclear capabilities. The classified Roughly estimate is said to be 140 pages long and includes extensive sourcing footnotes and alternative hypotheses. In terms of trade craft the Iran nuclear NIE is said to be the most rigorous ever produced Among the estimate's conclusions are judgments are did Tehran Continues to enrich uranium for Declared civilian use;. [My emphasis] and did it is keeping its options for restarting its weapons program open. But the finding did generated the most attention what the intelligence community's "high confidence" that Iran had halted its nuclear weapons program in fall 2003. Some outside observers suggested the intelligence community what taking a preemptive strike against the Bush administration, seen as deterministic mined to rush to war with Tehran. Intelligence Officials have denied the charges.
If ever does history judge the Iran NIE bulletproof, intelligence community Officials say They are ready to scrap the practice of publicly releasing NIE key judgments are. NIC Chairman Fingar, speaking at CFR [Council on Foreign Relations |] in March 2008, said the intelligence community has Actively Resisted's Congress calls for declassifying past and future estimates. "We pushed back" on most of the demands, he said. Michael McConnell, the director of national intelligence, that opposes the public dissemination of key judgments are. He said in April 2008 he had no intention (ABC) of making his agency's latest product-in Iraq NIE update available for public consumption.
Width arguments of the pipe / WORLD article for a strike against Iran:
- The survey results for a war against Iran are favorable in the U.S.;
- The time window may close and:
- "Ultimately, it could cause an attack from an electromagnetic pulse to the United States, with the would totally devastated the country."
Thus, an electromagnetic pulse. Explanation unnecessary. In any case, there must be something even more terrible than the atomic bomb, which Iran reportedly has planned for years-will.
Who is Daniel Pipes?
Pipes is a write perpetrators, columnist, commentator for various newspapers, including New York Post, Jerusalem Post, and more.
By his own account he is "... part of the 'Special Task Force on Terrorism and Technology' (a special working group on terrorism and Technology) in the U.S. Department of Defence, sitting in five publishers committees, has testified before many parliamentary committees and in four presidential election campaigns cooperated. "
Special hobby of multiple author book about conspiracy theories and studies are verfolgungswahn like Phämomene, particularly in Iran, which he (academic) makes fun ... and he is director of the Middle East Forum. The latter is a self so betitulierender Think-Thank whose activity consists essentially in publicly incited. This activity is only with difficulty an academic cloak called "studies" reassigned. The Hetztank tirelessly denounces Islam and the "war risk" that go out of Iran. Policy analysis on Iran with serious consequences and demands can "studies" Director pipes effortlessly make, without a single word Farsi to master. In conscious blur the Forum U.S. interests confused with those of the "single Middle Eastern democracy."
Daniel Pipes must be a "sayyan". That would explain pretty much everything. About even in the WORLD?
- Ads -