Against the Springer journal THE WORLD must be reimbursed to a war of aggression criminal charges of sedition and incitement to journalistic aid. It is also understood that the sheet a complaint by the Bundespresserat must be granted because it violated the most important principle of the Press Code, which reads: respect for truth and respect for human dignity. This Code of Ethics applies from 1.1.2009 for online media.
On 3.2.2010 is widely through the media that Iran wants to enter into concrete negotiations with foreign countries, so that uranium could be enriched there. "Ahmadinejad said Iran was ready to sign a contract for uranium exchange with the nuclear powers. Low enriched uranium can be sure also brought from Iran to other countries, he says. "(GA Bonn, 3.2.2010, p 2). Low-enriched uranium (3.5%) abroad concrete terms, then (France, Russia) be brought to 20% and then be sent back as a fuel for a research reactor in Iran. This solution to the nuclear dispute had been looming for weeks, if you followed the media reports carefully.
The Iranian president continued:
"We are not against it, to send our low-enriched uranium abroad because we want a constructive cooperation and because we can always produce low enriched uranium in Iran again," Ahmadinejad said. For his departure from the current position he called "technical reasons."
Instead of this offer to respond constructively-specifically, the United States, however, go further obviously a delaying tactic - to keep other options open?
Even worse: U.S. hawks who win in the U.S. after Obama's election defeats momentum again, now demanding even more so the bombing of Iran:
World-online from 3.2.2010: Iran must be bombed, which would at the same time the advantage of carrying Obama's poll numbers, which are in the basement, to the top.
"Barack Obama should bomb Iran,
By Daniel Pipes, February 3, 2010, 12:18 clock, Barack Obama's poll numbers fall into the basement. With topics such as unemployment and health system he has failed, he has also lost three by-elections. A dramatic gesture is needed to change the public perception. He must be to destroy the Iranian nuclear weapons command. "
Something so cynical and dehumanizing end I have long ceased to read.
The WORLD is an author, a forum of a war of aggression, destruction of lives and risking a Middle East war, which could easily lead to a world war, as an effective means calls in all seriousness, to improve "poll numbers"!
"He needs a dramatic gesture to change his public perception as a lightweight, Tinker, ideologue, preferably in an arena where the stakes are high, where he where he can take the lead and exceed expectations.
Cheap circumstances for an attack
There is such an opportunity: Obama can give the U.S. military the order to destroy the Iranian nuclear weapons capacity. The circumstances are favorable. First, the U.S. intelligence agencies withdrew their grotesque National Intelligence Estimate of 2007; that was the report, it was claimed under the "great certainty", Tehran had "halted its nuclear weapons program." Nobody (except the rulers in Iran and their agents) denies that the regime fans are loving it build a large nuclear arsenal. "
This is a lie. In the last "National Intelligence Estimate" of 2008 is to read about:
"Intelligence on Iran's Nuclear Program
Changes to the NIE process are most evident in the community's estimate on Iranian nuclear capabilities. The estimate is classified Said to be Roughly 140 pages long and includes extensive sourcing footnotes and alternative hypotheses. In terms of trade craft the Iran nuclear NIE is Said to be the most rigorous ever produced Among the estimate's conclusions are judgments are did Tehran Continues to enrich uranium for a declared civilian use;. [My emphasis] and did it is keeping its options for restarting its weapons program open. But the finding did generated the most attention what the intelligence community's "high confidence" that Iran had halted its nuclear weapons program in fall 2003. Some outside observers suggested the intelligence community what taking a preemptive strike against the Bush administration, seen as deterministic mined to rush to war with Tehran. Intelligence Officials have denied the charges.
Ever if history does judge the Iran NIE bulletproof, intelligence community Officials say They Are ready to scrap the practice of publicly releasing NIE key judgments are. NIC Chairman Fingar, speaking at CFR [Council on Foreign Relations |] in March 2008, Said The intelligence community Has Actively resisted Congress's calls for declassifying past and future estimates. "We pushed back" on most of the demands, he said. Michael McConnell, the director of national intelligence, that opposes the public dissemination of key judgments are. He Said in April 2008 he had no intention (ABC) of making his agency's latest product-in Iraq NIE update available for public consumption.
Width arguments of Pipes / WORLD article for a strike against Iran:
- The survey results for a war against Iran are favorable in the U.S.;
- The window of opportunity may close and:
- "In the end they might lead an attack from an electromagnetic pulse to the United States, with whom would completely devastated the country."
An electromagnetic pulse that is. Explanation unnecessary. In any case, it must be something even more terrible than the atomic bomb, which Iran reportedly has for years-plans-will.
Who is Daniel Pipes?
Pipes is a write perpetrators, columnist, commentator for various newspapers, including the New York Post, Jerusalem Post and much more.
By his own account he is "... a member of, Special Task Force on Terrorism and Technology '(a special working group on terrorism and technology) in the U.S. Department of Defense, is sitting in five Publisher committees, has testified before numerous parliamentary committees and in four presidential election campaigns cooperated. "
Special Hobby of multiple book author are studies on conspiracy theories and verfolgungswahn like Phämomene, particularly in Iran, about which he (academic) makes fun ... and he is director of the Middle-East Forum. The latter is a self so betitulierender Think-Thank whose activity consists essentially in publicly incited. This activity is only with difficulty an academic cloak called "studies" reassigned. The Hetztank castigates tirelessly Islamism and the "threat of war" who go out of Iran. Policy analysis on Iran with serious consequences and demands can "studies" Director Pipes effortlessly make, without a single word Farsi to master. In conscious blur the Forum U.S. interests confused with those of the "single Middle Eastern democracy."
Daniel Pipes must be a "sayyan". That would explain pretty much everything. Some even in the WORLD?
- Ads -