On the weekend came forward Rürup, head of the five years of farming practices on the euro bonds and transfer union to speak: "Now tell the truth. Controversial € Bonds are former farming practices, according to property already adopted e "(GA Bonn from 27./28.8.2011).
This follows an already known pattern Rürup: First, the voters, the public, deceived the people, it is appeased, invariably wound up, denied. Then, after a time, is called upon the people the plain truth, to tell the truth.
The one who brings about "brave" the truth surrounding the course, as with the aura of propriety, even heroic. The media regularly succumb to his charms.
However, it is here in many ways a travesty and a tremendous audacity:
Since will lied for years and appeases. The blueprint seems to be the Ongaschemong in Afghanistan for Germany: well drilling, noble defense of human and women's rights, a military form of increased development assistance, everything - not just war is taking place there, much less a war of aggression. The soldiers are dying there is to be read only by accident or malicious locals, they do not fall. "In the exercise of their official duties" as to the Bendler Block in Berlin. Not in defense of their country, as called for in the Basic Law. When after years the public deception and of the verbal maneuvering now took a back trodden Defense Minister of "war-similar states" speaks, breaks los deafening sonic applause: A hero is appeared, a truth hero, a manful ministers of the true words. Brave, courageous, just foolhardy.
Whether this sudden bills breaking the truth listen dazed and dazzled by her stole the light, we appreciate the words of the now for the truth Prepare to applause from the media and forget about years of falsehood and lies, the cover-up and atomization, voter fraud and Volksverarsche you.
On the euro bond, a Europe-and transfer community, says Rürup :: "Such guaranteed by the country community papers will have to come if you want to advance the European integration process. For we need to never forget that the euro was not introduced as an economic project, but as a political vehicle to promote this integration process. "
Euro bonds, so common bonds of all EU countries, which could cost the Germans with their good credit rating up to 40 billion additional spending through higher interest rates in the year so far, according to Rürup done deal. What is revealed for an understanding of democracy here?
Makes you wonder, have found that politicians at the time just has not the courage of truth à la Rürup? The Chancellor, who see the euro bonds the wrong incentives and all the other Bond € deniers?
The euro was thus never a commercial project? How could the Germans, then to be fooled for years to its introduction in 1998, he was so stable, even more stable than the D-mark be?
632 of 672 parliamentarians voted for the introduction of the euro, only 35 against. Twelve years later, is the common currency on the precipice - and that's a good thing. For they is yes only a "vehicle".
Helmut Kohl, who can celebrate themselves assiduously as a large, old statesman - he openly cheated when it comes to €?
"I am convinced that the success story continues the D-Mark in our country with a track record of the euro. The benefits that we have worked with the D-Mark and the D-Mark - rightly - estimate will not be lost. They are incorporated into a larger whole for the benefit of Germany and to Europe's advantage. "
After Rürup would then have been all pure tactic to get the political vehicle of €. Were the stability promise So a conscious deception for the benefit of higher then, noble EU-goals?
Since the euro was never an economic project - as you could ever promise stability? Put the former leaders to deliberately risking everything, what is the second person since the World War had again worked hard as economic security? Was therefore completely unaware of the warnings of many is economic and monetary experts?
SPD-Member Rürup is since 2009 boss of the aging speech financial service provider AWD and-established in the same year also nor a consultancy society together with Carsten Masch Meyer: the Masch Meyer Rürup AG.
That there was apparently no false modesty, small investors to bring their savings, now came to the public. The ARD was devoted to the topic: " Abzhocker Maschmeyer. Darling of the policy, a friend of the President "OD 8.9.2010 in unusually strong terms.
The damages and losses which allegedly came from consultations concluded there seem opposite to what Rürup reveals, however, at how little luxuries. But it goes even further with the Rürup revelations in an interview with the Bonner GA:
Question: Also reported Europafreunde distrust the euro bonds.
Answer: "Maybe. But many do not want to know: They exist already. At the top you € has agreed on a reform of the European Rettungsschirns. It should be a European Monetary Fund, can issue its own bonds, among other things. And since this institution is supported by the euro countries whose bonds' Euro Bonds' light 'are. That this is not yet communicated aggressively, may also be because that these decisions must be approved by national parliaments. "
Anderern with words, not "communicate aggressively," from the discussion and keep trying to conceal, of the parliaments as an obstacle?
In the Spiegel interview (35/2011) with Joschka Fischer, makes this clear message: Fischer affirmed the unrestricted transfer union. And: ". Must be the end, the United States of Europe" He understands Merkel salami tactic: "I do not understand why the Chancellor of the policy pursued in small steps, why they had not talked long plaintext. She would have been a year ago, telling the German people, the direction in which Europe has to develop. That we need more Europe, it is crucial that arrives on Germany and that we also have to pay anything for it because we propfitieren at the end of it " And: "I hope that the present generation is forced by the crisis to their happiness."
So that is the democracy of the EU Fischermen & Friends: The People's explain what is going on, plain text, talk and compel it to his happiness, through the crisis.
And what if it does not want?
Tags: Bert Rürup , Euro Bonds , Joschka Fischer , a transfer union
Angela Merkel
the image has given an interview on Sunday, while bonds issued € a resounding: "Euro bonds are the completely wrong way to cope with the crisis." http://www.facebook.com/AngelaMerkel/posts/263404373683476
If sinks through € bonds, the investor interest burden of all EU-Member States, then fewer EU-tax revenue is plowed at the financiers are.
This results, however, no signs of growth in order to grow out of debt.
The EU is a political product to the pursuit of power is to make individuals with civilian means better than war. If anyone wants the power, he / she should inform about the why and how. It is not just a matter of decency but also of participation.
Why should not the people want?
The euro bonds will help the EU and Germany on the world market to remain competitive. Without the EU Germany will lose on the world market in importance and at as an industrial-and business location attractiveness.
This does certainly not the people. So why does not the United States of Europe and Euro-bonds?