Football Championships: All about?

German Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich (CSU) is all the rage: Football is no longer just a nice, involving fighting, but ultimately unimportant game, but highly political state business: Friedrich turned ostentatiously protectively national player Mesut Ozil, who had delivered attacks on the Internet unprotected . He condemned the racist Internet campaign against the national team as "repugnant" and called for solidarity with all our players.

Since the German "summer fairy tale" 2006 in Germany a form of patriotism allowed and encouraged the public to the Debilitätsgrenze: the German football nationalism. The emotional appeal is made with all kinds of black-red-yellow jester costumes, plastic frippery and plenty of alcohol feeding, public Glotzing does the rest.

Apolitical was not from the beginning, but resulting in our country parallel societies with colorful baubles and the vuvuzelas should be stoned, quite apart from the function of football heroes as ge-ball-th examples of successful integration.

From the beginning, was played by Mesut Özil as a figurehead and Bambi for integration support an important role. Too bad that his (German) Turkish compatriots just him vilified as traitors . Others talk about the hot heads about why he did not divulge his Kurdish identity ( Mesut Özil Ben Kürdüm ), at least half of it is still one that others argue the rage from. And then there's somewhere in the depths of the network even people who find only ball artist with German names should play. Only against the latter Hetzer Friedrich has what he wants can be monitored by means of retention.

Thus, the Interior Minister is once again definitely offside and it is assumed that he deliberately violates repeatedly against the rules.

Because the Federal Constitutional Court had declared the retention in March 2010 to be unconstitutional and void. The judgment committed German telecommunications provider to immediately delete the previously collected data. U. a. Had led the SNB, the retention is contrary to Article 10 of the Basic Law, which guarantees the privacy of correspondence, posts and telecommunications secrecy.

Our Constitution will certainly survive if Turkish-German and German-German speakers and the revilers drain a few moist flatulence on the Internet. (A little tip: Simply the Getwittere and Getweete not read). What our makeup but does not tolerate, Unterminierer of the Basic Law and ignorant of the highest German court à la are Interior Minister Friedrich.

As the press reported, Friedrich had the "victory, victory" calls German audience also referred to as "shameful" and "The fact that a few so-called fans would have shown the forbidden Reichskriegsflagge calculated in the World War II German-occupied Ukraine., do him angry. 'As a German patriot, I am ashamed of how these people are trying our reputation in Europe and the world to damage', stressed the Minister of Interior. The overwhelming majority of football fans have nothing to do. It should not be that this tiny minority Determine the image and reputation of Germany pity. "

Because of a "vanishingly small minority" Friedrich would therefore like to commit breach of the constitution?

Perhaps the Minister should once apprise that football is a game where it's about victory or defeat. Friedrich want now so generally eradicate "victory" calls or only in countries where once were German soldiers, or how or what?

But why only 60 years back? How about the Thirty Years' War (1618-1648), when made war "naughty people flock" in German lands and murdered and set fire, so 16 million Germans then there were only 5-8 million.

We're now very, yes, more than quite desolate!
The naughty peoples crowd, the frantic Posaun
The fat from the blood sword, the thundering Kartaun,
Has all sweat and toil and stock aufgezehret.

(Andreas Gryphius).

Should we with this "naughty people" really still play football or perhaps all avoid, perhaps even not taken up first? Or we pick out only a few countries? Or "defeat, defeat," or call, or what?

Oh yes, and the imperial war flag.
To use the different versions without swastika says the Protection of the Constitution:

"The leadership of, Reichskriegsflagge 'satisfies neither a constituent of the Criminal Code nor the misdemeanor law. Nevertheless, the, imperial war flag 'under general police law and order be ensured if this is the necessary, appropriate and proportionate measure in individual cases, to ward off specific threats to public safety and order. This is for. Example, the case when the flag is the focal point of a specific impending danger and this can be solved by. "

Entering into argument is not without quite the comedy.

Was this flag at the European Championships so as a "focal point of a concrete danger" or Friedrich has just one important-important-problem? Maybe it can even be fixed with a black, red and yellow plugs?


- Advertisement - - Kredit von Privat an Privat

Share this post with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web with others.
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Webnews
  • Wikio DE
  • email

Tags: , , , ,

Leave a Reply