Football Championship: All about?

German Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich (CSU) is all the rage: Football is no longer just a nice, fight fitting but ultimately unimportant game, but highly political state business: Friedrich turned ostentatiously protectively in front of football player Mesut Özil, who is vulnerable to attack on the Internet without protection . He condemned the racist incitement against the National Internet players as "repugnant" and called for solidarity with all our players.

Since the German "summer fairy tale" 2006 in Germany a form of patriotism allowed and encouraged the public to the Debilitätsgrenze: the German football nationalism. The emotional appeal is made with all kinds of black-red-yellow jester costumes, plastic frippery and plenty of alcohol feed, Public Glotzing does the rest.

Apolitical was not from the beginning, but in our country resulting parallel societies with colorful baubles and the vuvuzelas should be stoned, quite apart from the function of the football hero as ge-ball-th examples of successful integration.

From the beginning, was played by Mesut Özil as a figurehead and Bambi for integration support an important role. Too bad that his (German) Turkish compatriots just him vilified as traitors . Others talk about the hot heads about why he did not divulge his Kurdish identity ( Mesut Özil Ben Kürdüm ), at least half of it was but one, others argue the rage from. And then there's somewhere in the depths of the network even people who find only ball artist with German names should play. Only against the latter Hetzer Friedrich has what he wants can be monitored by means of retention.

Thus, the Interior Minister is once again definitely offside and it is assumed that he deliberately violates repeatedly against the rules.

Because the Federal Constitutional Court had declared the retention in March 2010 to be unconstitutional and void. The judgment committed German telecommunications provider to immediately delete the previously collected data. Among other things, the BvG had argued that the retention is contrary to Article 10 of the Basic Law, which guarantees the correspondence, posts and telecommunications.

Our Constitution will certainly survive if Turkish-German and German-German speakers and the revilers drain a few moist flatulence on the internet. (A little tip: Simply the Getwittere and Getweete not read). What our Constitution, however, does not tolerate, Unterminierer the Basic Law and ignorant of the highest German court à la are Interior Minister Friedrich.

As the press reported, Friedrich had "victory, victory," shouts German audience also referred to as "shameful" and "The fact that a few so-called fans would have shown the forbidden Reichskriegsflagge calculated in the World War II German-occupied Ukraine., do him angry. 'As a German patriot, I am ashamed of how these people are trying our reputation in Europe and the world to damage', said the Minister of the Interior. The overwhelming majority of football fans have nothing to do. It should not be that this small minority Determine the image and reputation of Germany pity. "

Because of a "vanishingly small minority" Friedrich would therefore commit breach of the constitution?

Perhaps the Minister should once apprise that football is a game in which it comes to winning or losing. Friedrich would now like to eliminate so generally "win" calls or only in countries where once were German soldiers, or how or what?

But why only 60 years to go back? How about the Thirty Years War (1618-1648), when made war "naughty people flock" in German lands and murdered and set fire, so 16 million Germans subsequently lived only 5-8 million.

We're now very, yes, more than quite desolate!
The naughty folks flock, the frantic Posaun
The fat from the blood sword, the thundering Kartaun,
Has all sweat and toil and stock aufgezehret.

(Andreas Gryphius).

Should we with these "naughty people" really still play football or perhaps all avoid, perhaps even not taken up first? Or we pick out just a few countries? Or "defeat, defeat," or call, or what?

Oh yes, and the imperial war flag.
To use the different versions without swastika says the Protection of the Constitution:

"The leadership of, Reichskriegsflagge 'satisfies neither a constituent of the Criminal Code nor the misdemeanor law. Nevertheless, the, Reichskriegsflagge 'under general police and administrative law be ensured if this is the necessary, appropriate and proportionate measure in individual cases, to ward off the dangers specific to public safety and order. This is for example the case when the flag is the focal point of a specific impending danger and this can be solved by. "

Any submission is not without quite the comedy.

Was this flag at the European Championships as a as a "focal point of a concrete danger" or Friedrich has just one important-important-problem? Maybe yes it can be fixed with a black-red-yellow plugs?


- Ads - - Kredit von Privat an Privat

Share this post with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web with others.
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Webnews
  • Wikio DE
  • email

Tags: , , , ,

Leave a Reply