Attack scenario
Yesterday Hans Rühle explained in the "World" of the world, like an attack on Iran by Israel will look.
Rühle is noisy "world" expert on nuclear technology and weapons. From 1982 to 1988 he was director of the Policy Planning Staff at the Federal Ministry of Defence.
It can hardly be troubled, be discussed openly in the Springer press war scenarios, as if it were not for people, but a few insignificant pawns - which must of course pay the highest price in the end. As if not war a catastrophe that does not allow more boost.
Within a perversion of Denke put forward logical arguments is pointless basically. It also does not help to complain advanced insanity of the elites - they will not understand the need for a profound psycho-therapy for yourself than necessary.
There are no relevant social forces identified that would be willing to madness to challenge the truth, mention the churches, trade unions have other things to do and the majority of the party leaders stand united behind the claim of "German responsibility", which now not as a responsibility peace, but is interpreted as a responsibility or obligation to the war. From a historical responsibility. Because of our history.
The assumption is suggest that we have extensive experience with nuclear-armed rogue. The largest "rogue empire" was once called the Warsaw Pact. A perverse balance of terror got us a kind of peace, prevented a nuclear exchange on German soil.
(1991 were withdrawn from the territory of the GDR all Soviet nuclear weapons. In Western Europe, however, are still hundreds of stored 20 alone in West Germany (Büchel / Rheinland Pfalz) under Obama's command.)
The instruments of the Cold War were called "detente" - you will almost nostalgic stirred when one remembers those times - or "change through rapprochement" and "dialogue".
The instruments are tested and proven, which worked against a nuclear-armed "rogue" Warsaw block is compared to a (maybe) nuclear weapons aspiring Iran no longer be possible?
Today, the policy instruments are called: Politics Suspense: "We need to increase the pressure" by (calculated from the mouth of Guido Westerwelle!), A policy of refusal of dialogue, the demonization of incitement, not change through rapprochement, but regime change, change Isolation and Pressionierung individual states change through economic warfare, change through chaos.
The perverse lesson of the story is, that he who does not own atomic weapons in its arsenal, gets to feel this (Japan) or others, scarcely less terrible, such as chemical (Vietnam); States with limited conventional defense capabilities were ignored and destabilized (Chile under Allende and the murder of General Schneider), (Iran, deposing the democratically elected Dr. Mossadegh), bombs abgreichertem uranium arrived in Iraq and Afghanistan for use, or bombarding without declaration of war as recently in Libya and its leader brutally lynched (including Gadaffi and part of his family).
The moral level of the "Western community of values" was marked by the U.S. Secretary of State when she commented after Gaddafi lynching: "We came, we saw, he died, hahahaha".
An unproven, but permanently imputed Iranian pursuit of nuclear weapons would therefore nachvollziehber. Which ruler wants to suspend his country and its infrastructure the risk of being bombed into the stone age?
The nuclear-armed Pakistan is badgered with drones - Courtesy of Obama, in his Nobel Peace Prize. Today's newspaper article: "13 dead after two drone attacks". No further comment. How cheap human life has become! It's not our market place, once again explodes on a bomb that destroyed 70 lives.
Voices of reason have become rare, they do exist but obviously also on the Israeli side. The Germans with their unserern of politicians so frequently invoked responsibility for Israel would therefore appropriate contact person to comply with their responsibilities and special duty of care - to learn from history.
Peter Scholl Latour said several months ago in a television program, mutatis mutandis, it would not be the end of the story, when Persia would finally have nuclear weapons. Please read the very interesting interview of Ramon Schack about this topic on "zenith online" by 18.11.2011 :
"Peter Scholl-Latour reveals in an interview why he considers the danger of an Iranian nuclear bomb overrated and Western-style democracy is not a solution for the region.
zenith online: Mr. Scholl-Latour, the report of the International Atomic Energy Agency concerning the nuclear activities of Iran has led to new tensions. Was in Israel and public debate about a military strike against Tehran. The Israeli military historian Martin van Creveld replied the:, Israel can live with an Iranian bomb '! What do you think?
Peter Scholl-Latour: I agree with Martin van Creveld assessment. The way he expresses himself, incidentally also the former head of Mossad, Meir Dagan, a man on whom one should listen. If Iran has a nuclear bomb, he will not bomb Tel Aviv. In a moment like Israel and the United States would obliterate Iran nuclear - so suicidal you are not invested in Tehran. The threat to use the weapon, is a propaganda statement that is really untenable. There is also a strategically completely false view of things. The nuclear bomb of Iran should be a weapon of deterrence. "(Excerpt)
Expert Rühle is in the "world" quite clearly on war course. "Israel's government is facing a difficult decision, the country may face a difficult military operation. Though the chances of success are good, but risks remain. On his forces in any case, Israel can rely on. The Israeli air force is first class, the morale of the pilots is influenced by the history of Israel as the state of the Jews always vulnerable. "
Particularly incredible is the tunnel vision of the strategy experts that makes him perceive only two countries, as was the problem area to be separated from an expected reaction from Russia and China, with the risk of a subsequent chain reaction ...
The current events in Syria will receive an additional meaning when Rühle explains the planned Israeli routes for bombing of Iran:
Northern Route: Syrian-Turkish-Grenzhe northern Iraq militarily and politically otherwise quite attractive in Iran ". The other routes - via Jordan, Syria, and Iraq respectively over Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Iraq - are politically and militarily risky ".
At the end of the article Rühle is the decisive argument: "Auschwitz". With this club several wars already been justified, it is a bin-picking the arguments psychological operations, prepare and accompany the wars, the man's intention is clear - as far as the Germans ...
- Advertisement -
Tags: attack on Iran , The WORLD , Hans Rühle , Iran , Israel , Peter Scholl-Latour
The bad thing is, you felt so helpless.
There are infinitely many critical blogs, in which the risk is discussed, but this disgusting, depraved whores of the capital elite goes all over somewhere.
Do their job, do so, as it was about to clean the pigsty - clearly a few have gone, so it has everything shines.
Where to stay because the colorful good love left and green do-gooders?
The walk only "moral courage" to show if it did not hurt and goes against a state constructed and maintained bugbear, the pööösen Nazis. Before the runners this stupid Linge know it, divide and conquer. Castor and must be fought! Dumb as these people.
Previously there was times something like a "peace movement", but has since the disgusting tub of lard and sneaker Terrorist Josef Fischer with his Communist cells infiltrated and undermined the Greens, because nothing is more.
Now it is seated at the table of the Zionist NWO strategists, bought cheaply, his ambition for a little "honor" (Dr. hc) and a handful of American paper "silver linge" succumbed.
Looking at the other maid technologies such figures as the shaggy goat Ströbele to that unspeakable Roth and the bonus miles Ötzi can be only one bad.
Oh Zeitgeist ...
Oh lemmings.
When I think of Germany at night, I am deprived of sleep.
So Heine went even 160 years ago.
world and konsorten just know that their readership can earn even at war stupid and dumb. and if there is a few thousand or tens of thousands perish, what scherts the "elites" new?
dirt pack up.
[...] https://becklog.zeitgeist-online.de/2012/02/17/die-world-explains-kriegsszenario/ [...]
whine and moan no use. The first task is to take things as they are. it is quite clearly about fundamental changes in the Middle East. because many have various reasons a serious interest. the us politkberater, professor lewis, wrote down relevant thoughts in his books. and in britain is taught since colonial times: who dominates Europe, dominates the middle east, and who dominated the middle east, has a decisive influence on the global politics.
the crucial question for me is whether and how we can act violently out that germany elite this inhuman dirt game day not vote of the god mammon human sacrifice-making capitalism? the answer to this question is also the answer to whether our political system can not be called democracy?
when I call me the 30.9.2010 in Stuttgart in remembrance or yesterday's television pictures from greece, then I know there are still plenty of little people (in uniform), which lend themselves hesitation to go off on little people by force (in civil) . people who - made and incited kirre of lying propaganda - are ready, without thinking and without regard bashing losses on their peers, can be of 'the pacemakers' again send in a war.
My conclusion: it is in everyone's highly personal responsibility, how to work together and whether there is war or.