The former head of Mossad, Meir Dagan, warned for months publicly against an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. He hopes to prevent a catastrophe: "You have to remember what happens after that day." An attack was terrible for Israel, a disaster of unimaginable proportions. (see. Spiegel 45/2001, S. 110.)
The Nobel Günther Grass also gave public, so to speak the day after. His "poem", actually a short analysis, a document of great concern for world peace is also a proof that an acquaintance in the public's patience finally ran out. For Grass is to thank.
A few days ago the leaders of the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) had in New Delhi on their annual summit strongly encouraged to adjust the threats of war against Iran and Syria. They support the embargo policy against Iran and the escalation of pro-violence rhetoric and called for not to give a compromise and dialogue space.
For months, specifically for years, war scenarios military action is mainly in the US, but also the German media through debate, named favorable time frame for a first strike, called for, demanded. Foreign Policy magazines, thinking tanks and experts want to let the unthinkable seem conceivable and possible, the last dead point, which was brought to Israel in Match calculated, all 300 (!) Intolerable killed in a strike against Iran. The war players always hide it in their sandboxes but the possibilities of a domino effect in the Middle East, in which all voltages old scores could be unloaded and - more importantly - the unpredictable dynamics of war with a Russian intervention or even China. (More ...)
Share this post with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can find new content and share with others.
