Putin after plastic surgery? (Source: unknown)
Those who have followed the coverage of Syria, will ask for months: What makes the Kremlin?
In Tartus Russia maintains its only naval base in the Mediterranean, in the country itself live 100,000 Russians, 300,000 Syrians are connected in many ways directly with Russia.
While the infrastructure of Syria is being destroyed, a bloodbath after another is served by Islamists from the Gulf monarchies, Chechnya, Pakistan, Turkey, Libya, Lebanon, and even from Germany, UK, France and Sweden, experienced by the Syrian people only moral support from Moscow. Warm words of encouragement, like a mantra repeated references to international law, of which no one can buy anything, because the hard-nosed fighter and its Western referrers operate the bloody business totally frank ...
- Why Russia has so underestimated the Syria issue or: Does it at all?
- Why not sent Russia at the beginning a special command, a peacekeeping force, say, just about the Russian community, so to protect worth a total of 400,000 people? (A similar rhetoric could have prepared the application.)
- Russia is no longer willing or not able to protect its allies?
- What should the sudden intervention of the Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Bogdanov and his talk of a possible imminent rebel victory unfortunately at a high price (too high according to the minister). Plies here once translation problems before? Was that 22 hours later, denial by the Russian Foreign Ministry actually a limitation of the statement of the Vice Minister?
When I saw the following video set, was suddenly clear to me what is done here for a fight behind the scenes, and I received a response to a majority of the questions I could not answer me for months.
In addition, an excellent and very fresh layer analysis is provided, shocking facts presented (eg. Example that the extremists in Syria already shooting at government troops with chemical weapons and systematically seeds, livestock and livelihoods destroyed). The analysis also explains obvious why the "rebels" despite technical superiority can not win and therefore an Iraq-like approach, at the UN Security Council passed, could be imminent.
The two analysts and studio guests of "Neuromir TV" on 7/12/12 were Marat Musin, just returned fresh from Syria, in normal life, an economics professor at the University of Moscow and head of the Russian State Chamber of Commerce as well as the Blogger "El Murid", moderator of the political Analyst Jewgnij Tolstych.
Musin had repeatedly rotated together with the Abkhaz transmitter Anna News in Syria and put his uncut movies on the net and documented many of his observations mentioned it. His material of the Syrian front can be found here .
Here is said video:
Some important sentences from it:
"In 1-2 months we will stand as a traitor among the Syrians".
"If Russia gives up [in Syria], bloodshed and genocide will take place".
"The control of our country [Russia] is lost. And so Mr. Putin must take very tough decisions. "
"Syria is a key event, a boundary line".
"If our government in Syria denied her the future people will not believe a word about the alleged love for Russia."
- Advertisement -
Tags: Bogdanov , El Murid , Marat Musin , Neuromir TV , Russia , Syria
Although Putin was elected president, but when the other candidates has looked more closely at the election, it quickly became clear that Putin would be the better solution (but far from the best) for Russian society. On http://die-Russian-frage.de this issue was already discussed.
Russia claims that 3,500 Russian citizens living in Syria. The majority are Russian women who married to Syrians and their children.
How to get there to 100,000 or 400,000 Russians in Syria?
have not written 400,000 Russians, but the total number of those who professionally with Russia, directly, indirectly have to do, see source adjusted Video.Ihre source? Link?
I think the russians shy in contrast to the us americans against a wk III because they know as opposed to the amis very well what harm and suffering which such a war inflicts economic and population. and Syria could very easily be the trigger when the russians would actively intervene in the war currently raging there. for the us capital, however, is any war in primarily a business and human life are absolutely unimportant, so that it knows no inhibitions slaughter in direction or has. one need only recall cuba and the rocket crisis, where also the Russians knew more proven and gave in to the blackmail us.
far as I know the Russians have been actively mixed, because the putin the collar has burst, he can deploy a few of his latest Iskander missiles in syria now, source: http://denkbonus.wordpress.com/2012/12/17/ it-smells-to-peace / # comment-6440
I was also just think that Russia withdraws.
Then I found out that 24 mobile tactical cruise missile batteries Iskander-9K720 stationed there and the Syrian government were handed over. This advanced missile type should be grown no western missile defense mechanism.
If this is true, it explains why the NATO bullies and their propaganda machine is suddenly stopped. Shortly after this information became public. So in my opinion Russia is going very intelligent but de-escalating. Another example is the floating Cuba, so nuclear submarines that Russia has stationed around the United States, after "the mad elephant" USA has attempted Russia and China ringsrum enclose with anti-missile systems.
Why Russia or Putin, the same self-destructive means such as NATO should use, that would be just a godsend to isolate Russia politically.
Also interesting is this blog to be up to date on Syria: http://syrieninfo.blogspot.de/