A short message in the journal "The Soldier", which is considered the mouthpiece of the Austrian Ministry of Defence can, a bombshell in the truest sense of the word: have NATO countries and their allies in the Syrian civil war forces apparently even those murderous fire attack in October 2012 staged, who served on the border with Syria to justify the stationing of German, American and Dutch Patriot missiles in Turkey.
On Wednesday, October 3, 2012 proposes a fired grenade from Syria in the Turkish border village of Akcakale and killing five people, a mother and her four children. This grenade occurs immediately a flurry of political events going on. Immediately accused the Turkish government, the Syrian government, they have fired that grenade "Turkey is such provocations the Syrian regime that threaten our national security, never with impunity leave," said Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan yet on Wednesday night in Ankara (1). Immediately thereafter, the Turkish artillery shelling of the Syrian army, killing - according to Al-Jazeera - 34 people.
- A day later decides the Turkish parliament in a quick-fix action a war authorization for the government. From now on, Turkish soldiers can military operations across the border in Syria perform, "whose frame number and time are set by the government."
- On the evening of 3/10/2012 occurs at the request of Turkey in Brussels, the NATO Council on the basis of Article 4 of the NATO Treaty: "The Parties will consult together whenever, in the opinion of one of them, the territorial integrity, political independence or security of any of the Parties is threatened. "NATO-Council strongly condemned the" acts of aggression "and classifies it as a" violation of international law "one. The Syrian leadership needs to "heinous breach of international law quit," it says in the NATO statement (2). That the Syrian government rejects responsibility for the shelling of Akcakale, is simply ignored. The burning question, who has since fired that grenade and for what purpose mainly is made either politically or media.
- Without further investigation of the events, the Syrian government is declared the culprit: The EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton calls on Syria to end the violence and to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of neighboring countries. French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius urged a clear condemnation of the Syrian government by the UN Security Council. His British colleague Hague publicly supported the military response of Turkey. The Austrian Foreign Minister Spindelegger immediately makes Damascus for the fire attack responsible (3). The German Chancellor Merkel etched in the direction of Russia and China, the NATO-prejudgement not wanted so simple to join: "The UN Security Council is not doing its job, because China and Russia block further demands. We really encounter here resistors that are difficult to understand me sometimes "(5).
- Patriot Missile Based on Article 5 of the NATO Treaty (defense commitment, when a NATO member is attacked) decide to USA, Netherlands and Germany called in the Turkish border region: Right after this (pre) sentence turns the west by the military escalation screw. to deploy to Syria. The German Foreign Minister Westerwelle to the Bundestag: "When a NATO partner asks for help, then we have to have very good reasons for such a request not to comply. Such reasons I do not see "(5).
- In Germany the decision is waved by the Bundestag in December 2012, in January 2013, the stationing of missile systems start; towards the end of January, the deployment is already largely completed - violent protest against the Turkish people and the peace movement.
You have to understand: With Patriots no grenades can be intercepted, they used to shoot down aircraft and ballistic missiles. You have a very powerful radar system, allows the elucidation within a radius of 150 km. The deployment of Patriots thus provides the technical requirement for so-called. "No-fly zones" set up, and thus escalate the Syrian war by Libyan pattern. This is not officially added, the Turkish government has repeatedly demanded in the past. Under the pretext of protecting the Turkish population weapons systems will be installed in the interest of further military escalation of the Syrian War and the conflicts in the region. The vast majority of the Turkish population rejects this deployment. You know that it's not about their protection, but rather continues to drag the country into a military conflict.
So far so in fast motion the events since October 3, 2012 The release, those grenade that killed five people on this day in Akcakale is now hardly mentioned. It harbored investigative Turkish journalists from the beginning to doubt the official story. Thus, the Turkish newspaper "Yurt" (6) reported a few days after the fire attack, that hand on the labeling of the mortar shells had been found that there had in fact been to NATO ammunition in the fire everywhere. But as the Syrian army has no NATO weapons would only Western-backed "rebels" as the author in question. But in Western media and politics, this question was taboo, as long as the decisions on the Patriot deployments were not waved by the parliaments.
Mouthpiece of Defense can bombshell
Now that the facts set abgenickt decisions and weapons systems are deployed, a gap in the official information blockade has risen. A small, but unofficial, so that appropriate background knowledge can be provided. The magazine "The Soldier", which is true according to Herold "as the official mouthpiece of the Austrian Ministry of Defence," Issue No. 1/2013 can be in the burst of 18 January 2013, an equally short and explosive message in the truest sense of the word a bomb.:
"Turkey: Those grenade launcher from Syria that killed five Turks, clearly stems from NATO stocks. It seems as if the NATO-member Turkey supports the Syrian rebels with weapons deliveries. However, these supplies would have to be coordinated with other NATO countries. "(7)
These few lines leave no stone of the former Western propaganda on the other. The following sequence of events around the 10/3/2012 gets overwhelming plausibility:
1) NATO or NATO arming the "rebels" in Syria.
2) The NATO allies shoot with these weapons on NATO member Turkey, killing five people here.
3) This staged fire attack immediately the Syrian government blamed to have a legitimacy to deploy NATO missile at the Turkish-Syrian border and continue to fuel the conflict.
Sources:
(1) cited by WAZ, 03.10.2012
(2) quoted by daily news, 04.10.2012
(3) cited in: ORF Evening Journal, 04.10.2012
(4) Star, 05.10.2012
(5) The time 21.11.2012
(6) http://www.yurtgazetesi.com.tr
(7) The soldier, 1/2013, 18:01:20
Note: This very informative article reached me from the cyber space. The author or the author so far I could not find. If I succeed, I'll Subsequent addition a source of reference!
Supplement of 20 May 2013: It was an article of NEOPRESSE. Here is the Quelle: www.neopresse.com/politik/naherosten/nun-ist-es-offiziell-der-granatangriff-auf-die-turkei-war-inszeniert/
- Advertisement -
Tags: grenade attack , Patriots , Syria , Turkey
It could also be quite different (and perhaps worse). Namely, that any NATO country has the Assad regime sold grenades. My tip: Turkey itself.