Leutnann Christian Neumann on 31.08.13 in Cologne at the rally against Syria war
On 31/08/13 a spontaneous rally in front of the Cologne Cathedral took place in the face of over-hitting and disturbing events to the Chemical Weapons spiral of escalation towards a war in Syria, in the face of alleged evidence that are kept secret from the USA ,
in view of the journey of the German Chief of Staff Volker Wieker to Jordan in order to discuss in Amman with other military the "coalition of the willing" in terms of military action against Syria. (In addition to U.S. Chief of Staff Martin Dempsey were present: his counterparts from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Germany, France, Britain, Italy and Canada.)
Hands Off Syria, demo on 08.31.13 in Cologne
In Cologne, several groups involved, including talking Christian Neumann, spokesman for the Darmstadt signal, the critical forum of German soldiers and the members of the Bundestag Sevim Dagdelen (Die Linke).
In the following excerpts of the speech Lieutenant Neumann, (For full text, please call on the website of the Darmstadt signal under Syria - Blueprint Iraq .)
"For over two years we are pursuing with considerable indignation the political propaganda on the events in Syria. Worse than the reactions congenial criminal government in Washington, London and Paris, a face unmasked war incendiary coverage in the editorial offices of major media houses. For this purpose, the following should be noted:
- With probability bordering on certainty, it is clear that multiple chemical agents have been used in Syria war, as well as on 21.8.2013 in settlements near the Syrian region GHUTA DAMASCUS.
- There is as yet no hard evidence that troops of the Assad regime, the copyright holder of this insert were on 8/21/2013. On the contrary! The papers submitted by the United States government on the evening of 30/08/2013 to 08/21/2013 GHUTA lost in indications and contradictions. Alone to have made the intervention decision before the final picture of the situation, the fact illustrates the mockery.
-
If there is ample evidence for the use of chemical weapons by the anti-Assad guerrillas in several recent cases. Prof. Dr. Albert A. Stahel of the Institute of Strategic Studies at the University of Zurich published three days ago: Together tinkered C-weapons systems have the opposition as perpetrators out '. Since last year a Drohvideo the rebels on Youtube where poison gas ingredients from Turkey showed werden.Quelle: https://becklog.zeitgeist-online.de/2012/12/06/droht-irak-2-0-in-syrien-akutekriegsgefahr-
by-geturkte-chemical weapons / Some of the war criminals were nabbed in Turkey with battle tank. There is much evidence that the deeply involved in the Syria war western allies of the anti-Assad guerrillas have provided logistical and technical support for the production and the previously made use of chemical weapons. Such "false flag operations" are from the war history well known and documented - even the GRÖFAZ had let attack the transmitter Gleiwitz concentration camp prisoners in Polish uniforms and then kackfrech asserts: "From 5 clock 45, shot back," corroborated the thesis from: The Anti-Assad has exposed guerrilla weapons of mass destruction in order to force the West to intervene in their favor - the Obama talk of the "red line" which was the unmistakable indication of how this was to fumble. - Since the five coordinated sarin gas attacks by the Omu Shinrikyo sect on 20.03.1995 is shown that it is possible in every backyard garage zusammenzumixen chemical warfare agents and to bring then to use.
- Since the beginning of the Civil War is trying to blame the government troops massacre, who have not committed this proven, so z. Example of the HULA.
- As rightly pointed out by competent, the Assad government would have to be deranged of collective madness, when they had last year used chemical weapons on the unique threat Obama, particularly since the government troops already clearly are on the road to victory after they joined the Hezbollah be effectively supported. Why, damn it, Assad should be in the moment of victory collective commit suicide (want)?
- The Syrian War was fired from the start with all means of Western governments. Examples: arms shipments over middle eastern allies, undercover operations by special forces, equipment, supplies, etc. Nevertheless, this synthetic war threatened by failure - and now that the defeat was imminent, catch the government criminals in London, Washington and Paris to play foul.
- All wars of aggression of NATO, respectively. Western states since Yugoslavia in 1999 always followed the same pattern: at the beginning of an alleged massacre (Racak 1999) happened, getting thousands of innocent civilians died allegedly or threatened to be massacred (Libya 2011), always the looks "Western community of values" forced the alleged perpetrator to bomb, so to kill even more people to "protect" a supposedly from a "humanitarian catastrophe" threatened population (one
called the RtoP, the Responsibility to Protect). - If the conventional massacre is not sufficient to produce the aggressive war enthusiasm of the masses, is often resorted to the threat posed by weapons of mass destruction in order to fuel this (Iraq 2003).
- Without a relevant mandate of the UN Security Council (or a previous attack of Syria to another state) any use of military force is a violation of international law act of aggression and thus a crime under international law. Added that the Security Council is itself bound by the UN Charter and no statutory adverse charters for military
May exhibit violence. - The currently planned air attack on Syria is foreseeable significant human losses, have also uninvolved civilians in the form of so-called collateral damage result. The victims of the criminal Chemical Weapons inserts them not come back to life. Revenge and retribution, still committed to by those who put themselves up to its neck in the swamp of international law crime, can never be maxim of a responsible international politics.
- Should Turkey take part in an illegal attack on Syria, the PATRIOT units of the Bundeswehr must be removed from operation 'Active Fence Turkey "and brought home immediately. If not, they become participants of aggression at a crime under international law. Moreover, it is the legal obligation of the Federal Government, the aggressors to refuse any assistance to carry out their war of aggression. (Closure of German airspace, failure to perform any management support, etc.).
[...]
Yes, we want to end the Syria war. But military means only worsen the situation (cf.. Iraq 1988 to the present). More than 30 months of skirmishes resulted in approximately 2 million refugees. Germany put 340 million euros a humanitarian emergency. Of these, only a fraction has benefited the needy. Several million euro sank into the pockets of a few profiteers. Profiteers in Syria's neighboring countries who harbor an interest in the war. We call on the media to give these profiteers a face!
For the competitive types SYRIA disappears who can. The opposition to Assad was from the beginning not lightly armed grassroots movement. Upgraded paramilitaries (mercenaries) require the regular Syrian troops out permanently and professionally coordinated endurance. We realize here is fighting not a classic folk of civilians against regular armed forces! Who is actually behind this aggressive heterogeneous opposition? Answers to this question obscure in the mainstream of warmongers.
[...]
Only 2% of the population Radikalfundamentalisten sufficient to inflict the damage that had to be documented for 2.5 years in the case of SYRIA. A reconstruction SYRIA after the end of the wave of destruction will be largely financed with proceeds from commodity sales. Has the world approved for this reason a long-lasting process of destruction to weaken SYRIA? For resource-rich countries around ISRAEL provide per se for the Zionists is a threat, because the revenues from the extractive profit lead in peacetime to POWER. Precisely this aspect should be suppressed. The absolute hegemony in the Middle East is to remain granted permanent ISRAEL According to the hawks. "
Responsible: Lieutenant Christian Neumann, Avenariusstr. 3a, 22587 Hamburg. Facts with significant involvement in treasure and formulation to first-12 by Lt. Col. Ret. Dipl.-Ped. Jürgen Rose
***
The next speaker, the Bundestagsabgeordente Sevim Dagdelen, delivered a fiery anti-war speech. She spoke among others about the duplicity of German politics: The government appeased the one hand the public that Germany would not participate in military action in Syria, on the other hand they sent their top military to Jordan to obvious preparations for war in the country, where the United States has long jihadist rebels form against Syria . Dagdelen also recalled that the government had previously supported the rebels already extensively with material (such as armored vehicles and body armor).
This duplicity saw Dagdelen already in Iraq war z. Example with the German behavior to grant the CIA overflight rights, to provide militarily usable data etc.
Dagdelen pleaded for the denial of overflight rights and the closure of U.S. military bases in the event of an international illegal war of aggression against Syria.
Incredibly appears you notice, the parties have refused to conform to debate in the Bundestag, the theme Syria: The election campaign is now times more important than world peace ...
- Advertisement -
Tags: Christian Neumann , Darmstadt signal , Cologne Demo , Sevim Dagdelen , Syria , Volker Wieker
Two lobby decisions these days demonstrate legality and powerlessness of the people, when it comes to war decisions:
Syria: Without the presence of clear evidence Syrian government of using poison gas against its own people is accused. In any case, Western leaders and Mrs. Merkel are as agreed - even before UN inspectors have begun their investigation so right. The expressed suspicion sufficient to prejudice and for acting.
Germany: Despite present clear facts about the years of use of the monitoring program → tenses by the British Secret Service → GCHQ against supposed allies and countries in the middle of Europe, the federal government does nothing to protect its own population. Yes - those in power in the Bundestag even reject an online debate and publication of a petition against the British monitoring program tenses. In any case, most parliamentarians are as agreed. The present facts are not enough to a conviction and for acting.
I'm talking here of parliamentarians? No - I mean only the people with this name - I'm talking about the lobbyists.
Lobbyists - the representatives of the Total State - the henchmen of totalitarianism.
These lobbyists are mutually excel in upcoming election campaigns in the scramble and attempt to gain power, leadership and coalition courts thus negating war ambitions. This allows you to manipulate the people. But when it comes down to it, they will make decisions for war operations and justify this with treaty obligations - see War in Afghanistan. As Brecht said in 1935: "appeasement. If the Upper talking of peace, the common people know that there is war. If the Upper curse the war, the Gestellungsbefehle are already written out. "
The topic LOBBYING I will devote myself here under the page "topics" in more detail. But to think give me the facts described here. Especially makes me think that the majority of people (over 80%) in this country, but also elsewhere - is against global surveillance mania and new war plans - including the United States. They understand in the majority even deeper background. However, resulting from that knowledge? The mass (the people) is doing NOTHING, absolutely nothing, however. These people in this country are going in the ground in few weeks for the parliamentary elections. They are diligently the powerful Partorgs again choose any colorful-democratic party, which all hold of grassroots democracy and popular rule nothing.
You will make this system want to keep from misanthropic lobbying, abuse of power, lies, total surveillance and warmongering.
I wonder repeatedly - the man is really only awake when he is in the sewer, in the deepest mud, in the most hopeless modders, in the face of the near end? Is there really only one so-called revolutionary situation, when the dialectical dimension overflows? OR - can be good time before it is too late to rouse the masses?
Do what?
In the face of this fact - let us begin here! It is sorely needed ... for this world!
The consequences: Tempora continues unhindered. This country has lost the war as no right to sovereignty - not until today. This law is still not fixed. Meanwhile, the end of August the UN inspectors are from the west instructed to leave Syria 2013. Flying after American missile over Syria sky? What would follow? In any case, a lot of collateral damage - we know. Then Hezbollah would be forced to intervene - one is allies and feels threatened. Iran has to pursue considerable interests. In turn calls on Israel to arms and are already looking ahead a partial mobilization known. The Egyptians would then also distract from their own problems and would also go to war - only on whose side? As Turkey important military bases missile Dispatcher and its allies has, one will get in the vortex. Germany would find itself back in the middle in the wake of the war. It would fulfill treaty obligations. Strikes to the intrinsically country could be the result. The whole region around the entire Mediterranean and beyond, would ultimately feel the need to defend any interests or obligations by force of arms. Even the small Latvia must now "move" in the far north of Europe. And - if all already "on the wheel turn" - I mean the wheels of history - then of course Russia has already ordered more warships in the Eastern Mediterranean's. It has been in Syria a "military-technical supply point of the Russian Navy". French aircraft carrier waiting already in the region. Suitable anchorages are scarce. What does only the Great Middle Kingdom (China) to this? Thus, the measure also is really full to allow this quantity overrun suddenly at war potential in a new quality, of course, are British cruisers before Gibraltar coast already in position. What is answer to Spain? And - a Never-Ending-Storry is continued. Now even Russia is threatening the sheikhs in Saudi Arabia with war.
To get to the point: Here sparked the potential for a third world war. A wildfire threatens and people sit comfortably in the second row in front of the ZDF television garden,
Thereafter ... to coincide with coffee and cake on a chancellor candidate spectacle equally between puppets, totalitarian representatives and lobbyists.
Be rubbing their hands with the gentlemen → Wegmann & Co ..
Warning: Already an American president warned the end of his term (certainly very late) in his closing speech on January 17, 1961 about the dangers of lobbying specifically in the form of the military-industrial complex: "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, sought or unsought Whether, by the military-industrial complex. . ... We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes "In the translation it says:" We in the government councils must contact us before the appropriation of unauthorized influence - whether intentionally or unintentionally - by the military-industrial complex . protection We ... may it never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or our democratic processes "(Wikiquote Source - Article →" Dwight D. Eisenhower ".) In the presence of a certain Mr." Snowden has done just that his contribution - nothing Other, not more and not less.
And? Who wants to wear the uniforms? Surely it is not so bad ...
Personally, I do not currently want to comment on the subject of tenses and Syria. Moved, this is all the time and too little respected by many a. As a former military I'm not entirely fail to assess basic, basic existential questions. Why is apparently so little interest and consequent actions visible to the people? I think so long about it. Maybe that's the answer: Whose shoes you have not worn, whose existence can not understand and certainly not live. It is all the more important, personally go ahead of example, when it comes to believe in basic human values and way to live it - no matter what faith we belong, where we come from or where we're going. Yes - respect and respect for fellow human beings and the created - that's the key ... Hopefully Many try, to go this way - in case of errors, which we have all. Only - my hope is that this key not only opens doors and eyes, but also in time to approach each other and global solutions leads (). And STILL - let us bring these flabby body lies of the current parliamentary democracy in Europe by gentle pressure with your thumb to vibrate. Let's see how long will this bubble. Let's see if we can not bring back this bubble people more worthy, more civilized and more comprehensive global for all.
Related Items
U.S. doctrine: From R2P after R2A
Libya: The United States justified their intervention with their "Responsibility To Protect (R2P)", which means, as that the United States have a responsibility weaker (rebel terrorists) against the strong (Muammar al-Gaddafi) to (existing ) protect.
Syria: The United States to establish a possible intervention with their "Responsibility To Attack (R2A)", which ultimately means nothing, how to have the moraliche obligation must attack, regardless of whether this the Strong (Assad) or weak (rebels terrorists) is responsible for the poison gas attack; no matter whether it the weakest (Syrian people) suffers from the attack.
This change in U.S. doctrine of R2P by R2A was made by the United States tacitly in recent weeks. That this change helps the US-American interests and serves mainly the own line of argument for intervention in Syria, is self-evident. Almost as a moral index finger and justification instance, that one will always draw a use of the United States to be "exceeded red line", who may have this then whatever crosses.
But how far it really is with this moral, justifying index finger? Where was this in the bombing of Fallujah with phosphorus shells by the USA? Where was this when Saddam Hussein with acquiescence and support of the USA gassed its own Kurdish population? Where was this dioxin-containing low-key than the USA Agent Orange sprayed over Vietnam? Or where is that, if disposed of the "democratic Western powers" its uranium waste per DU (depleted uranium) in Iraq and Afghanistan?
more here: http://konjunktion.info/2013/09/us-doctrine-of-r2p-to-r2a/