With 'Peter Scholl-Latour' tagged articles

"The world," declared war scenario

Friday, February 17, 2012

Attack scenario

Yesterday Hans Rühle explained in the "World" of the world, like an attack on Iran will look through Israel.

Rühle's loud "world" expert on nuclear technology and weapons. From 1982 to 1988 he was Director of the Policy Planning Staff in the German Defense.

It can hardly be troubled, as discussed openly in the Springer press war scenarios, as if it were not for people, but a few insignificant chess pieces - which must of course pay the highest price in the end. As if not war a disaster that does not allow more boost.

Within a perversion of Denke put forward logical arguments is basically pointless. It also does not help to complain advanced insanity of the ruling elites - they will not understand the need for a profound psycho-therapy for yourself than necessary.

There are no relevant societal forces identified that would be willing to madness to challenge the truth, mention the churches, trade unions have other things to do and the majority of the party leaders are united behind the claim of "German responsibility", which is now not as a responsibility peace, but is interpreted as a responsibility and obligation to war. From a historical responsibility. Because of our history. (more ...)

Afghanistan's election issue

Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Afghanistan: Panschir-Tal; Foto: Ann Jones

Afghanistan: Panjshir valley; Photo: Ann Jones

Afghanistan is still become an election issue. The death of about 100 Afghans has caused this. The exact number of deaths and the exact percentage of gunmen who perished in the bombing of a requested Colonel Klein American F-15 Jagdbomers victim will probably not be currently out. Because the fronts are completely moved not only in Afghanistan but also in the home.

The German Basic Law and international human rights law prohibit wars of aggression, and the armed forces must be explicitly used only for defensive purposes. Indeed, Article 26 of the Basic Law says:

Actions that are appropriate and undertaken with the intent to disturb the peaceful relations between nations, especially to prepare the aggressive war, are unconstitutional. They are to be punishable.

Immediately following the terrorist attacks of September 2001 were called Laden as the mastermind of the heinous attacks out of Afghanistan a certain Osama Bin acting, though he himself, are just like his 19 accomplices in their (majority), Saudi citizens.

The attacks in 2001, there were certainly likely to disturb the peaceful relations between nations, but was Osama Bin Laden a state? Had his evil work is relevant under international law? This question was answered by America and NATO clearly "yes". The question can only be answered with good reason, just as with "no", because in this way could in the future, everyone fanatics, regardless of whatever stripe, the country in which he allegedly staying straight, can become a war aim. (more ...)