With 'PNAC' tagged articles

Libya: Name list of the warmongers

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Who had thought the US neoconservatism had abdicated Obama's election, had very wrong. At most, the Roosters Reported Tatung the proven, energetic group of US Think anchor chair and military strategists to be desired in Germany. You want this country to people obviously do not expect the tireless, fiery warmongers - because that could protect the noble image of the noble, white knights, who are again on the way to spread democratic values ​​in the world and in particular (based on a proven pattern) civilian populations which can shake a little.

So we will hold back the tears of emotion and open the eyes and ears for:

Here comes ... PNAC. The Project for a New American century of.

Remember: The infamous policy paper in 1997 called for, inter alia, a transformation of the Middle East. The vehicle was the "idea" (!) Of the war on terror have been the first domino of Iraq.

Of course, so that the reconstruction of the Middle East was not complete - the "project" had called for much walking distance Deres. But let us first video from 20.3.2011 of policy commentator ("Fox News") and neocon journalist William Kristol ("The Weekley Standard"), son of the "Godfather of neoconservatism" Irving Kristol, to:

(Read more ...)

Afghanistan's election issue

Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Afghanistan: Panschir-Tal; Foto: Ann Jones

Afghanistan: Panjshir valley; Photo: Ann Jones

Afghanistan is still become an election issue. The death of about 100 Afghans has caused this. The exact number of deaths and the exact percentage of gunmen who perished in the bombing of a requested Colonel Klein American F-15 Jagdbomers victim will probably not be currently out. Because the fronts are completely moved not only in Afghanistan but also in the home.

The German Basic Law and international human rights law prohibit wars of aggression, and the armed forces must be explicitly used only for defensive purposes. Indeed, Article 26 of the Basic Law says:

Actions that are appropriate and undertaken with the intent to disturb the peaceful relations between nations, especially to prepare the aggressive war, are unconstitutional. They are to be punishable.

Immediately following the terrorist attacks of September 2001 were called Laden as the mastermind of the heinous attacks out of Afghanistan a certain Osama Bin acting, though he himself, are just like his 19 accomplices in their (majority), Saudi citizens.

The attacks in 2001, there were certainly likely to disturb the peaceful relations between nations, but was Osama Bin Laden a state? Had his evil work is relevant under international law? This question was answered by America and NATO clearly "yes". The question can only be answered with good reason, just as with "no", because in this way could in the future, everyone fanatics, regardless of whatever stripe, the country in which he allegedly staying straight, can become a war aim. (more ...)